Print this page

1.9

hardly worth mentioning
Crashes / Fires:
0 / 0
Injuries / Deaths:
0 / 0
Average Mileage:
82,799 miles

About These NHTSA Complaints:

This data is from the NHTSA — the US gov't agency tasked with vehicle safety. Complaints are spread across multiple & redundant categories, & are not organized by problem.

So how do you find out what problems are occurring? For this NHTSA complaint data, the only way is to read through the comments below. Any duplicates or errors? It's not us.

2000 Toyota Tundra body / paint problems

body / paint problem

Find something helpful? Spread the word.
Get notified about new defects, investigations, recalls & lawsuits for the 2000 Toyota Tundra:

Unsubscribe any time. We don't sell/share your email.

2000 Toyota Tundra Owner Comments (Page 3 of 4)

« Read the previous 20 complaints

problem #31

May 012010

Tundra

  • 104,000 miles

A D V E R T I S E M E N T S

The contact owns a 2000 Toyota Tundra. The contact received notification of NHTSA recall campaign id number 09V444000 (structure: Frame and members: Underbody shields) and took the vehicle to an authorized dealer for repairs. The dealer advised the vehicle did not exhibit enough rust for them to make any repairs to the vehicle. The dealer advised that once the vehicle had rusted more extensively, they would then make repairs. The manufacturer was not contacted. The failure and current mileages were 104,000.

- West Hartford, CT, USA

problem #30

Jan 012010

Tundra 6-cyl

  • miles
2000 Toyota Tundra. Consumer writes to express discontent about treatment at a Toyota dealer in regards to repairs the consumer stated the vehicle began making a squeaking noise. The vehicle was inspected and the consumer was informed that the left rear shackle needed to be replaced. When the vehicle was being lifted, the frame broke because it was severely corroded. The consumer then learned that the vehicle had been recalled for frame corrosion. The consumer stated she and her husband were never notified of a recall. The consumer was informed the rear leaf springs, the front lower arms, rear shocks and steering rack needed to be replaced. The consumer believed it was related to the broken frame. But, Toyota refused responsibility of any other repairs.

- Pomfret Center, CT, USA

problem #29

Apr 082010

Tundra 8-cyl

  • 107,000 miles
The contact owns a 2000 Toyota Tundra. The contact stated after receiving notification of NHTSA recall campaign id number: 09V444000 (structure: Frame and members: Underbody shields) he made an appointment for recall repairs accordingly. The dealer inspected the vehicle and advised the contact that rust and corrosion vehicle was beyond repair. The manufacturer confirmed the dealers advised and would not provide any assistance. The contact believed the manufacturer was careless in handling the recall and that he should be reimbursed for the defect that existed in the vehicle and could potentially cause a crash. The failure and current mileages were 107,000. Updated 08/24/10. Updated 08/26/10

- Jonesville, LA, USA

problem #28

Jan 042010

Tundra

  • miles

A D V E R T I S E M E N T S

My 2000 Toyota Tundra was recalled for frame corrosion and the truck sat in a Toyota dealership parking lot for 4 months until Toyota just decided this week that they are going to replace the rusted frame but they wouldn't guarantee this for free - they said they if anything else goes wrong while they are replacing the frame, that they may not pay for it and that I will have to. I find this completely unacceptable as this is a recall - why should I have to pay anything out of my pocket?

- Arlington, MA, USA

problem #27

Apr 072010

Tundra 6-cyl

  • 44,853 miles
The contact owns a 2000 Toyota Tundra. The contact stated he received notification of NHTSA recall campaign id number: 09V444000 (structure: Frame and members: Underbody shields) and took the vehicle to the dealer for repairs. Toyota refused to authorize the repairs to the vehicle stating the odometer was branded. The contact advised the odometer was not branded and he had documentation that stated otherwise. The failure mileage was 44,853 and the current mileage was 44,873. Updated 08/24/10. Updated 08/25/10

- West Terrehate, IN, USA

Search CarComplaints.com for these popular complaint phrases...

problem #26

May 082010

Tundra 4WD 8-cyl

  • 108,800 miles
I have a Tundra 2000. Most of the frame are corroded due to rust. While driving, hit a pot hole and the gas tank straps let go due to corrosion. Gas tank drop to the ground, luckily I pull to the side and no accident happen. Thanks god.

- Lowell, MA, USA

problem #25

Aug 032008

Tundra

  • miles

A D V E R T I S E M E N T S

The contact owns a 2000 Toyota Tundra. The contact stated that while driving at unknown speeds, the vehicle would exhibit excessive shaking. The dealer stated that the vehicle needed new tires. The vehicle was taken to a local mechanic for a second opinion and then taken back to the dealer for further diagnostic testing. The dealer stated that the driveshaft center bearing needed to be replaced. The contact also stated that the frame was covered with severe corrosion and rust. The fuel tank was barely attached to the vehicle. The contact referenced NHTSA recall campaign id number 09V444000 (structure: Frame and members: Underbody shields) but was unable to confirm if his VIN was included in the recall. The driveshaft center bearing was replaced by the dealer who also classified the vehicle as condemned. The failure and current mileages were unknown.

- Windsor , MA, USA

problem #24

Mar 132010

Tundra 8-cyl

  • Automatic transmission
  • 105,524 miles
The contact owns a 2000 Toyota Tundra. The contact took the vehicle to an authorized dealer to inspect the structure body. There was a recall under NHTSA campaign id number 09V444000 (structure; frame and members: Underbody shields). The technician was unable to find a defect within the rear cross member associated with the recall ; however, a hole was detected in the left front frame rail. The hole was contributed to an excessive amount of rust. The manufacturer notified the contact regarding the rust on the frame and stated that the contact would be responsible for the repairs. The contact stated that the vehicle was unsafe and failed to comply with the standards to pass the state safety inspection. The failure mileage was 105,524. Updated 11/11/10 the consumer stated Toyota has since authorized and completed the replacement of the frame at no cost to him. Updated 11/18/10 updated 12/02/10 the consumer stated Toyota authorized the replacement of the frame at no charge to him. Updated 12/07/10

- East Greenville, PA, USA

problem #23

Apr 222008

Tundra 4WD 8-cyl

  • miles
2000 Toyota Tundra failed the routine state inspection. The service writer explained that the truck frame had severe rust/rot perforation damage that resulted in the frame essentially breaking in half. The break in the frame, also broke the rear brake and fuel lines in half.

- Shirley, MA, USA

problem #22

Jul 292009

Tundra

  • miles
2000 Toyota Tundra. Consumer states that the frame of the vehicle is rotting away. The consumer stated the cross member was so rusted, that the spare tire dropped from the vehicle and onto the road.

- South Windsor, CT, USA

problem #21

Feb 152010

Tundra

  • 150,000 miles

A D V E R T I S E M E N T S

Information redacted pursuant to the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6) this is regarding my 2000 Toyota Tundra, [xxx]. I am aware that the ntsb has issued a bulletin (#09V444000) concerning rusty frames on my model and year, specifically regarding the cross member holding the spare tire. That cross member on my truck is solid, however the spring mount portion of the frame has completely disintegrated and broken. Fortunately it broke while I was leaving my driveway, not while I was doing 65 mph on the highway. The local dealer service manager and an area Toyota representative have examined the vehicle. They have concluded that it is out of warranty and that Toyota is not liable. Toyota has already accepted responsibility for rust problems on the 2000 Tacoma frames. I made them aware of the rust issues on my truck when the Tacoma recalls were first announced, but they have insisted that it is not a problem. I believe that the rear suspension falling out from under my truck is a safety hazard and should be their problem.

- Shrewsbury, PA, USA

problem #20

Mar 122010

(reported on)

Tundra 8-cyl

  • miles
2000 Toyota Tundra SR5. Consumer states experiences with the frame rust and cross member issues. The consumer stated he was shock to discover the amount of rust that had developed on almost all of the rear frame components.

- Niantic, CT, USA

problem #19

May 012008

Tundra 4WD 8-cyl

  • Automatic transmission
  • 72,000 miles
The contact owns a 2000 Toyota Tundra. Upon taking the vehicle for routine maintenance, the mechanic noticed excessive corrosion and holes in the front and rear frame. The dealer verified the corrosion of the frame and advised the vehicle was unsafe to operate. The manufacturer was contacted and advised purchasing a new vehicle. They did not assist. No repairs were made to the vehicle. The failure mileage was 72,000 and the current was 74,000. Updated 05/07/10. Updated 05/13/10. Pictures received 09/21/10.

- Lemont , IL, USA

problem #18

Mar 022010

(reported on)

Tundra

  • miles
Toyota Tundra truck recall the consumer read about a recall in the newspaper regarding rust on the rear cross-member. The consumer took his vehicle to the dealer and upon inspection, they discovered rust on the cross-member. Updated 03/10/10

- Saugerties, NY, USA

problem #17

Feb 092010

Tundra 6-cyl

  • miles
Toyota refusing to repair my 2000 trundra pickup after defects have been detected. The dealer discovered frame rust at the rear axle connection. The consumer stated a recall had been issued for the 2000-2003 models. Updated 03/09/10

- Carolina, RI, USA

problem #16

Feb 022010

Tundra

  • 135,000 miles
On 2-03-10 while driving vehicle slowly through a parking lot I traversed a speed bump and heard aloud banging noise from the rear of vehicle. Upon inspection, the rear leaf spring shackle apparently disintegrated from rust and separated from the frame[.as of that date I had yet to receive NHTSA campaign number 09V444000 from the mfg.].I proceeded to the dealership the next day and upon inspection they deemed the truck unsafe to operate and they indicated that the main frame rusted and there were holes through the rear frame. Dealership took photos and indicated they would forwarded all information to corporate office. I was provided a vehicle for transportation until corporate makes a decision. Almost three wks. And no decision, and according to Corp. Office no time table to resolve.please note, I advised Corp. Office of my safety concerns on 6-19-2009, regarding severe rusting condition of frame. They assigned a case # and stated no action to date on the 2000 Tundra's. I consider myself fortunate this safety issue did not cause a serious accident, and I feel very strongly that it is time for NHTSA to further investigate these safety issues.

- Wayland, MA, USA

problem #15

Dec 142009

Tundra 8-cyl

  • Automatic transmission
  • 81,581 miles
The contact owns a 2000 Toyota Tundra. During routine maintenance her independent mechanic stated that the sub-frame deteriorated. The Toyota dealer also confirmed that the sub-frame deteriorated. The manufacturer stated that they would notify her to determine how to rectify the failure. There were no recalls. The failure and current mileages were under 81,582. Updated 02/13/10 the dealer informed the consumer, the vehicle was unsafe to drive. Updated 02/16/17. The consumer still has not heard from Toyota, even though he was told he would receive a call back within 2-3 weeks a decision. Updated 03/09/10

- East Middlebury, VT, USA

problem #14

Nov 282009

Tundra 4WD 8-cyl

  • 98,000 miles
Inspection of the vehicle's frame indicates that there is extensive rot beyond the crossmember involved in the current recall for this vehicle. The current recall is limited to the crossmember supporting the vehicles spare tire, while the frame rot uncovered in this inspection involves the frame rails (running front to back) in the vicinity of both forward wheel wells and it is extremely apparent within the drivers side wheel well. In addition, there is extensive rot in the frame beneath the drivers seat in the vicinity of the rear brake line mounts and also in another crossmember forming the rear shock tower on the passengers side. It would appear the rot is so extensive that the frame is beyond economical repair and replacement would be warranted. No crash or injuries were involved.*/10/09 update cw ** updated 01/06/10 the consumer sent in pictures of the vehicle. Updated 01/06/10.

- Greenville, RI, USA

problem #13

Nov 252009

Tundra 8-cyl

  • miles
Severely rusted frame, brackets & anything else attached to the frame. Frame is so rotted that huge chunks of metal are coming off. Frame rotted at front of frame where it meets the bumper (I'm just waiting for the bumper to fall off), tire cross member rotted (I have removed the tire). Entire frame needs to be replaced due to rust, beyond repair. Frame has been this way for years & Toyota will do nothing about it. Updated 02/01/10.

- Goodyear, AZ, USA

problem #12

Nov 062009

Tundra 8-cyl

  • miles
Abnormal frame rust on 2000 Toyota Tundra. Upon having a sprayed in bedliner installed to further enhance/preserve our vehicle the installation company advised us they noted a severe amount of frame rust, that was not consistent with the condition of the rest of vehicle. They were under the vehicle for a fire watch during the installation of two welded patches to the truck bed to eliminate rust in the bed before it spread. Upon further investigation the frame is indeed inconsistently rusted in comparison to the remainder of the vehicle. This includes substantial rusting of the support for the fuel tank which is a safety concern. The local dealer suggested that based on the year of the vehicle the frame may have been coated in Ohio where there was a problem with the proper amount coating being applied, but that they were not doing anything at this time for customers. (similar to the Tacoma that have been recalled). Updated 03/29/10 pictures received 10/07/10

- Mystic, CT, USA

Read the next 11 complaints »

Not what you are looking for?