Toyota issued a recall for the 2000 Tundra frame stating the corrosion protection was insufficient for the climate in the northern region causing the mount for the rear tire to fall off.there fix was to undercoat only the back half and not addressing the front part of the frame which is made out of the same metal, the frame is rusting away at both the transmission mounts and behind motor mounts causing the truck to be very unsafe because this was brought to there attention after was they said was there cam pane which ended ON12/31/12 they have nothing else to do with anybody body they did this to can be driving something that will fail and somebodys life will be lost.

- Levittown, PA, USA

2000 Toyota Tundra. Consumer writes in regards to vehicle severe corrosion recall notice...the consumer stated he called three dealers to have the recall performed. The first dealer stated there were no appointments available for an inspection, the second dealer stated there were no more parts available and they could not order any more. The third dealer stated they could help and the consumer made an appointment. However, a few days later the consumer received a call from the dealer requesting he return the loaner vehicle, or he would be charged. The dealer informed the consumer the truck had not been inspected and no repairs were performed, and they would call him when the recall was revised. On May 9, 2012, the consumer noticed the gas tank was hanging on the ground. The rear support strap had rusted through. While making the repairs, the consumer noticed rust flakes the size of softballs were falling off the frame...updated 08/01/13

- Arlington Heights, IL, USA

Toyota states that the following is a safety issue: Campaign bxd (safety recall 90M crc application phase 2) 2000 - 2003 my Tundra frame corrosion-resistant compound but will not fix the recall due to it being expired not full six months ago.

- Hamburg, NJ, USA

I received a recall for frame rust. Upon taking my truck to a dealer I was told there was no perforation and that I would be notified of when a rust inhibitor was available. Truck has an extraordinary amount of rust on the frame from being in a northern state for the first seven years on the road. Toyota now says they will not apply rust inhibitor because truck is registered in a southern state. All trucks in northern states are being coated regardless of point of origin. Where a truck is registered is immaterial if the truck displays extra ordinary amounts of rust. This rust is causing brake and fuel lines to prematurely rust and will surely cause early failure.

- Helena, AL, USA

I recently took this truck in on a trade and knew nothing about Toyota's frame rust issues. Called Toyota customer experience center and explained the rust perforation issue I noticed on this truck. Has a marble sized hole by the drivers side spring perch and the frame is thin on both sides in that area. The passenger side behind the wheel has a hole the size of a tennis ball on the side, a hole the size of a golf ball on the bottom(same area), and a hole an inch wide by four inches long on the top of frame(same area). The rest of the frame is heavily rusted and thin. The rust comes off in big flakes. I explained all this to Toyota and received a case # and was told some one would contact me. Well finally got a call and they said they would do nothing yeah that is right nothing about it since their good will "limited service campaign A0F" had expired. So now that they will do nothing about it I have a truck that is a time bomb waiting to break apart hopefully some one doesn't get killed with this death trap. Way to make a happy customer Toyota !!!! wonder how many more people will get duped by Toyota.

- Manchester, IA, USA

In June 2010 my Tundra was repaired after being recalled for a severely rusted frame and spare tire housing. What signaled the problem was when my spare tire dropped from the mount and was dangling above the ground causing me to almost loose control on an off ramp. The first dealer inspected the vehicle and told me "the frame is so rusted I can put a screwdriver thru it". he then allowed me to drive home. On a second opinion, the truck was pulled off the road. When I picked up the truck following the repairs the spare was in truckbed and I had to ask for it to be installed. ( had they even looked at it?) )N 1/25/13 while pumping gas, I look behind the vehicle and see the spare tire on the ground! the plate that holds the tire was worn away. I contacted Toyota who told me that these things can happen in colder climates but when pressed she said that I could get it inspected and also have the fuel tank straps inspected as there had be rust issues with these on the 2000 Tundra. When I asked if there would be a recall or notification, I was told no. This is appalling. The tire easily could have fallen off while being driven and now a fuel tank holder may be rusted. Shouldn't there be a recall? I had talked to a ntsb member but wanted to update since I talked to Toyota.

- Haverhill, MA, USA

On 1/1/2013 while at the dealer for an oil change, I was informed that there was a small hole in the frame. I was told that this was not covered by the recent recall because it had expired and not to worry about the hole. The hole is about the size of a half dollar and right above the front wheel. There is also severe rust scaling around the area and several large pieces of frame loose inside the hole. My Tundra has always been serviced by this dealer who also performed the recall inspection. When inspected initially there were no issued found. When I brought the vehicle in for the undercoating protection included in the recall the dealer didn't have the material. I filed a complaint with Toyota usa. Case #1109231360. In 2011. I have not received an update on the complaint. I am the original owner of the vehicle and have had all my service done at this dealer. How did they not notice this hole until after the recall expired? my concern is that the frame is rusting prematurely and the dealer turned a blind eye to it in order to avoid the cost of the repair. Than after the recall expired, informed me of the defect. I no longer feel safe driving this vehicle.

- Wallingford, CT, USA

The contact owns a 2000 Toyota Tundra. The contact received notification of NHTSA campaign id number: 09V444000 (structure: Frame and members: Under body shields). The vehicle was taken to the dealer, who disassembled the entire vehicle and installed a new chassis, per the recall. The contact stated that after the repairs he could no longer tow his trailer. In addition, the evap system and the rack in pinion warning codes were displayed. The vehicle was taken back to the dealer who advised the contact that they did not cause any of the new issues with the codes on the vehicle. The manufacturer was notified who stated that whatever the dealer advised that they would stand by their decision. The vehicle was not repaired a second time. The failure mileage was 98,000.

- Ronkonkoma, NY, USA

The contact owns a 2000 Toyota Tundra. The contact stated that after receiving a recall in regards to NHTSA campaign id number 09V444000 (structure: Frame and members: Underbody shields). The contact had the recall component repaired. The contact stated that while driving approximately 15 to 20 mph, the right front side of the vehicle dropped. The contact exiting and inspecting the vehicle, he noticed that the wheel had separated. The vehicle was later towed to an independent mechanic. After diagnosis they advised him that the ball joints failed. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was contacted and they offered no assistance. The failure and current mileage was approximately 163,075. Updated 2/4/13 updated 02/21/13

- Saginaw, MN, USA

This is a follow up to previous E-mail sent 12/6/2010 ODI #10375754 Toyota has addressed the frame and crossmember but not the brackets holding everything to frame.the pictures I sent show significant rust and now two years later Toyota has not responded to the problem.the rust on the leaf spring bracket is dangerously close to failing.is there any course of action to get Toyota to address the problem. Thanks for any help.

- Neptune, NJ, USA

I have a 2000 Toyota Tundra pick up 4 X 4. on both sides of the truck, the frame between the front wheels and front bumper has perforation damage. The front bumper is about to fall off the truck. The rest of the truck frame has extensive rust.

- College Park, MD, USA

I had a recall letter from Toyota regarding frame rust. It was to be done at no charge. When the dealer inspected the frame, they said the truck qualified for frame replacement at no charge. When the work was beginning, however, I received a phone call stating numerous parts had to be replaced because they were destroyed during the frame replacement process. I was told it was not negotiable and I would have to pay for them. These included all shocks, tie rods and ends for $350. Also, they suggested replacing the steering rack and radiator cap for an additional $650. I have contacted Toyota corporation to try to get the real story of what is covered and what may not be covered.

- Hamburg, PA, USA

2000 Toyota Tundra. Consumer writes in regards to recall notice concerning severe corrosion of the rear cross member the consumer complied with the recall notice and took the vehicle to the dealer to be inspected. An inspection revealed, the vehicle was unsafe to drive. The consumer was given a loaner vehicle. However, a day in a half later, the consumer was advised to return the loaner and to pick up his vehicle because Toyota would not authorize the repair as the vehicle was a total loss according to a carfax report. Toyota advised the consumer once he contacted carfax to have them delete the vehicle as being a total loss, they would repair the vehicle.

- Wausau, WI, USA

TL- the contact submitted an email and requested that the official IVOQ be written verbatim to the email: I am the owner of a 2000 Toyota Tundra with severe frame rot. I can not get Toyota to replace my frame because the vehicle was a rebuilt vehicle. The only thing they could do was replace the rear cross member. The problem I have with this is that my truck is excellent condition with the exception of the frame. I bought it with 50,000 miles on it and it now has 189,000 miles on it. A local man had his replaced and the truck will pass an inspection. It is frustrating I sent a letter to Toyota a year ago and to no response. So I guess my question is are they pulling the wool over my eyes and to doing the replacement or am I just screwed. Assignees and notifications* updated 05/02/12 updated 05/04/12

- Troy , ME, USA

The contact owns a 2000 Toyota Tundra. The contact was driving approximately 5 mph over a road hump when he heard a loud popping noise. After inspecting the vehicle, he noticed that the front fuel tank strap was severely rusted and fractured. The vehicle was able to be driven approximately 10 mph and was taken to the dealer who replaced the fuel tank strap. The manufacturer was contacted and reimbursed the contact for the part. The failure mileage was approximately 100,000. Updated 02/22/12 the consumer stated the vehicle had severe frame rust, including the cross member, gas straps, brake lines, proportional valve etc. Updated 03/01/12

- Foristell, MO, USA

2000 Toyota Tundra. Consumer requests reimbursement for recall repairs related to rust the consumer stated the dealer had his vehicle for two months. When he finally went to pick up the vehicle, the dealer handed him an invoice for work that was performed. The consumer stated he only went in for a recall repair.

- Grand Rapids, MN, USA

The contact owns a 2000 Toyota Tundra. The contact stated that was sent a letter from the manufacturer for the spare tire rack. The vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer who stated that due to excessive rust, the entire frame needed to be replaced. The contact called the manufacturer who stated that before the tire rack repair could be performed, the frame, rear shocks, emergency brake cables and linkage, exhaust system, fuel filter bracket, front sway bar, transmission mount and bolts, front brake hoses, steering shaft knuckle, fuel tank system and body mounts needed to be replaced. The failure mileage was 50,000. Updated 01/04/12

- Owings, MD, USA

2000 Toyota Tundra. Consumer states that the brackets and frame have been corroding. Consumer states that this issue has nothing to do with the recall for the spare tire bracket. The consumer stated it appeared the metal was breaking off in layers and would cause a failure on the part it was connected too.

- Neptune, NJ, USA

2000 Toyota Tundra. Consumer writes regarding vehicle rust the consumer stated his vehicle passed the inspection rust recall. However, one of the straps that held the gas tank rusted through and failed after the inspection. Also, the consumer had to pat $800 for a new steering rack.

- Georgetown, DE, USA

2000 Toyota Tundra. Consumer states problem with frame rust the dealer informed the consumer the vehicle would be repaired under recall at no cost to him. Several days later, the consumer was then told the recall repair would cost him $1,200. The dealer stated that price included additional parts that were needed to replace the frame as they would most likely not be able to be reused, as parts would be damaged as the truck was disassembled. The consumer contacted Toyota customer service and he was told Toyota paid for the frame replacement, and that anything additional required by the dealer was between the consumer and the dealership.

- Belchertown, MA, USA