The rotors were rusted and corroded which resulted in an accidetn. (NHTSA # 99V340000)

- Baltimore, MD, USA

Consumer took vehicle in for manufactures recall 747 repairs. Consumer stated that after a year later, front rotors were warped.

- E. Saracuse, NY, USA

Consumer took car into dealer for recall repairs to replace rotors, consumer was getting a pulsating noise, and whenever putting on brakes would hear a loud bang.

- Boise, IA, USA

Brake rotors failed prior to recall notification 99V-340, consumer request reimbursement. Nlm

- Memphis, TN, USA

Consumer thinks Chrysler should be heavily fined for safety recall campaign (98V-005), consumer states that most vehicle has already had their brakes serviced.

- Cleveland, OH, USA

Consumer vehicle is not included in selective recall for the disc brake rotor problem, because they do not considerd deleware to be a part of the salt belt, 99V-340.

- Unknown, UN, USA

In April 2000 my vehicle was taken to triboro in response to the recall that called for the rotors to be replaced. In September 2000 I returned the vehicle to triboro a unrelated repair and was informed that the brakes and rotors needed replacement. Upon returning home we realized that the rotors were "alledgedly new" however a brake repair shop related that the rotors appear to be old and not the new coated rotors required under the recall. Upon contact with triboro and having them check their computer to confirm the "new rotors" we were told that we probably wore them out with bad pads. We tryed to reason with them in regards to the unlikelihood of new rotors needing replacement after only 10,000 miles, but they were un yielding. In contacting the chysler corporation recall division, we were instructed to take the vehicle to another dealer and get a estimate on the replacement of brakes and the condition of the rotors, at our expense. We are very concerned now about having to put out money to confirm that the recall replacement was not performed. In contact with our local congressional office has informed us that it is best to contact this office and that the necessary action would be taken to correct this matter. Thank you for your time and anticipated cooperation in this matter.

- Cherry Hill, NJ, USA

Brought Jeep into lawless for recall they said the rotors were ok on Aug 28,2000.after 2 weeks and 400 miles the front left rotor split during a stop at intersection which made vehicle not stop. Luckily for my wife and daughter the other car was able to stop.the mechanic who inspected rotors 2 weeks prior should be reprimanded.

- Lexington, MA, USA

Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component (99V-340) prior to recall notification, consumer is requesting reimbursement.

- Mansfield, MA, USA

Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component (99V-340) prior to recall notification, consumer is requesting reimbursement.

- Clark, NJ, USA

Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component (99V-340) prior to recall notification, owner requesting reimbursement.

- Warrenton, VA, USA

Recall99V340000, front brake rotors; received recall in December, able to finally get an appointment in August 9, 2000. Went to dealer @ luchetti Jeep, Wyoming avenue, West pittson, pa, 570-655-1433, and let two persons in front of him at 8:00am. Got into an argument, and dealer did not remedy recall, which may cause a crash.

- Throop, PA, USA

Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component prior to recall notification and is having trouble receiving reimbursement from the manufacturer. (99V-340)

- Hennepin, IL, USA

Consumer contacted dealer in reference to recall 99V340000/manufacturer's recall 747. Dealer stated that recall work has already been done in January. Consumer noted the last contact with that dealer was in November.

- Virginia Beach, VA, USA

Front brake rotors failed prior to recall notice 99V-340. Nlm

- Utica, NY, USA

While driving and attempting to apply brakes, found out that he did not have any brakes because rotors had separated. Consumer was traveling approximately 30 mph, no injuries.

- Brockport, NY, USA

Structure, door : both doors have cracked welds where top & bottom hinges attach to chassis. Engine : bolts attaching right side motor mounts to engine sheared off (dealer implied factory support, demanded payment after work completed). Brakes disc : brake rotors rusted out well before 3 year, 36,000 warranty, dealer denied coverage. Brake rotors later subject to inspection & replace as needed recall, except owner repairs prior to recall not covered!

- Rocky River, OH, USA

Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component prior to recall notification, however denied reimbursement due to failure problem.

- Kinnelon, NJ, USA

Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component prior to recall notification (99V-340).

- Crown Poin, IN, USA

Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component prior to notification, request reimbursement. (99V-340)

- Darien, IL, USA