Shortly after 14,000 miles, we took our 2006 Volvo XC90 in to have our tires rotated and balanced. The tire dealership would not even touch the tires but advised us to go directly to Volvo because the tires were an extreme safety hazard. After about a month and repeated phone calls, Volvo did replace the tires, charging us for one tire. There have been numerous reports of bad pirelli tires on the 2006 XC90. Volvo blames pirelli; pirelli blames Volvo. There have been no recalls on the tires, although Volvo in tallahassee made reference to a memo from Volvo alerting them to the problem. We feel fortunate that we caught the problem before we or others were injured and are appalled that Volvo has done nothing to inform the owners of the danger. Our problem is fixed, at least momentarily, but there are other cars on the road with these same tires and drivers who are completely unaware of the danger. They are riding the same roads we are and could very likely be coming at us across lanes of traffic due to the tires. So, we are not actually safe! can someone do something to force Volvo to do a recall or at least alert the owners? this did not show up at the 7,000 mile checkup with Volvo and we were not warned, even though the service people had the memo at that time.

- Tallahassee, FL, USA

The contact owns a 2006 Volvo XC90. The vehicle has pirelli, size P235/55R17 tires. In October of 2006, the contact took his vehicle in for inspection. He was informed that the vehicle failed inspection and needed four new tires. Volvo stated that they replaced the tires at 12,000 miles with pirelli's consent. In October of 2007, the vehicle failed inspection again for the same reason as the previous year. The two front tires have tread separation and need to be replaced. The contact believes that the two rear tires will also need to be replaced. Pirelli stated that Volvo would replace the tires, however, Volvo stated that they would not replace the tires a second time. Neither corporations have replaced the tires. The tires were supposed to get 65,000 miles of use. The contact believes that the tires are inferior and poor quality and should not be his responsibility to replace. The purchase date was unknown. The tire failure mileage was 29,000. The vehicle current mileage was 29,000 and failure mileage was 12,000. Updated 12/12/07.

- Royersford, PA, USA

The contact owns a 2006 Volvo XC90. While driving, the contact heard a loud noise and the steering became difficult. The dealer stated that the tie rods were under recall and replaced them. After returning home, the contact examined the paperwork which stated that the tires were completely bald. She called the dealer and they picked up her vehicle. The dealer is currently replacing all four pirelli 17 inch tires, however, she must pay 50% of the cost. The engine size and dot number were unknown. The current and failure mileages were 23,000.

- Addison, IL, USA

The contact owns a 2006 Volvo XC90. The contact noticed that the tread on the vehicle's pirelli scorpion zero tires were completely worn on both of the front tires. The dealer stated that the tires were indeed worn but failed to provide an explanation. The dealer offered to replace the tires and pro-rate the cost. The contact stated that she has waited approximately three weeks for the dealer to receive the tires. The current mileage is 17,700 and failure mileage was 15,000. Updated 06/19/07

- Porter Ranch, CA, USA

2006 Volvo XC90 tires - pirelli scorpion zero 104H tire tread wore very early. Tires had 15,000 miles on them with one tire less than 3/32's tread left. Volvo was aware of this early tread wear problem as early as May 2006. In the three weeks we had to wait for our replacement tires the one tire had almost no tread left. We purchased the car July 2006 with the "defective tires" still on the car. If Volvo knew of the tread wear problem in May 2006, why didn't the consumers?

- Austin, TX, USA