- December 18: Toyota RAV4 Battery Drain Class Action Lawsuit Continues news | 4 days ago
- December 12: Toyota Tundra Engine Recall Lawsuit Filed as Class Action news | 10 days ago
- December 6: Toyota RAV4 and Lexus NX Wheels May Fall Off recalls | 16 days ago
- December 2: Toyota Door Lock Actuator Problems Cause Lawsuit news | 20 days ago
- November 29: Toyota Coolant Bypass Valve Lawsuit Dismissed news | 23 days ago
CarComplaints.com Notes: If you're looking for a vehicle with one of the most complained about transmission on the road, look no further than the 2001-2003 Toyota RAV4.
In 2001 Toyota completely redesigned the popular SUV. While some enjoyed the new look, they did not enjoy the harsh shifting, jumping from gear-to-gear and eventual transmission failure that cost owners well over $3,000 to fix. The problem stems from a malfunctioning Electronic Control Module (ECM).
Consumer outrage coupled with pressure from different agencies led Toyota to extend the warranty nationwide back in 2010. The previous power train warranty only covered 5 years/60,000 miles, while the extended warranty now covers the transmission and ECM for 10 years/150,000 miles. Toyota also pledged to reimburse any owners who had previously paid for repairs, if they had "proper proof". Good luck collecting on that one.
10.0
really awful- Typical Repair Cost:
- $2,000
- Average Mileage:
- 136,350 miles
- Total Complaints:
- 3 complaints
Most Common Solutions:
- replace ecm (3 reports)
electrical problem
Helpful websites
- No one has added a helpful site for this 2003 RAV4 problem yet. Be the first!
A D V E R T I S E M E N T S
Toyota knew of this problem and sent out letters in 2010 saying that they will stand good for the ECM, electronic control module for 10 years or 150,000 miles. When I experienced problems the service department said Toyota's agreement expired in 2013. Now, I have to pay $2,000 for a new ECM or drive it stopping and sputtering. I was aware that the 2002 Toyota Rav4's had these problems but when I looked online and in Consumer Reports they reported the problem was taken care of or I wouldn't have bought a 2003. Toyota should have to stand behind these faulty parts. I bought a Toyota because they are supposed to be made better and run longer. I am going to buy a Ford next time.
- Darla W., Loogootee, IN, US