- December 18: Toyota RAV4 Battery Drain Class Action Lawsuit Continues news | 4 days ago
- December 12: Toyota Tundra Engine Recall Lawsuit Filed as Class Action news | 10 days ago
- December 6: Toyota RAV4 and Lexus NX Wheels May Fall Off recalls | 16 days ago
- December 2: Toyota Door Lock Actuator Problems Cause Lawsuit news | 20 days ago
- November 29: Toyota Coolant Bypass Valve Lawsuit Dismissed news | 23 days ago
CarComplaints.com Notes: If you're looking for a vehicle with one of the most complained about transmission on the road, look no further than the 2001-2003 Toyota RAV4.
In 2001 Toyota completely redesigned the popular SUV. While some enjoyed the new look, they did not enjoy the harsh shifting, jumping from gear-to-gear and eventual transmission failure that cost owners well over $3,000 to fix. The problem stems from a malfunctioning Electronic Control Module (ECM).
Consumer outrage coupled with pressure from different agencies led Toyota to extend the warranty nationwide back in 2010. The previous power train warranty only covered 5 years/60,000 miles, while the extended warranty now covers the transmission and ECM for 10 years/150,000 miles. Toyota also pledged to reimburse any owners who had previously paid for repairs, if they had "proper proof". Good luck collecting on that one.
10.0
really awful- Typical Repair Cost:
- No data
- Average Mileage:
- 2,300 miles
- Total Complaints:
- 1 complaints
Most Common Solutions:
- not sure (1 reports)
body / paint problem
Helpful websites
- No one has added a helpful site for this 2002 RAV4 problem yet. Be the first!
A D V E R T I S E M E N T S
entire car, including engine rusted out within 2 years
I bought a Rav 4 due to a friend owning one in 2002, paying full price with 10,000 down, and the rest financed. I never missed a payment, and cannot remember the financing rate, other than paying in off in 4 years. Unfortunately this purchase was made during a period of being disabled after a traumatic event. Although garaged it began to rust out, first the body, then the engine. Since mentally, I was suffering with physical, and PTSD symtoms, I was unable to stand up for myself, and follow through with legal ramifications.
I remember the car was still under warranty. I cannot believe, in looking back, the car was taken to the dealership in San Francisco, put up on a lifting device, surrounded by managers and such, thus giving me the diagnosis of, "You have been driving in salt water. Case closed." So untrue, so cruel. I am a Registered Nurse with excellent personal references at the time, had been assaulted while on duty, suffered as I stated above and these men, no female present except myself, and never drove through salt water. Obviously, the car had not been sealed properly. Stupidly, the payments were still made. I just was not myself. If I was, I would have fought it with all my strength, and gotten proper closure.
When I look back today, it is still very much in the forefront of my mind. My marbles are all in a row, and I want this to be rectified. I live on disability pay, which is poverty. To most of the county 25,000 is a good bit of money. I drive a 26 old car that is on its last legs. After all the deceptive individuals that have taken advantage of a person, who was temporarily vulnerable, and permanently disabled, what is left is one that is on a mission, to get Toyota to listen.
- almostrustedout, San Mateo, CA, US