- December 23: ToyotaCare Plus Lawsuit Placed on Hold news | 0 days ago
- December 18: Toyota RAV4 Battery Drain Class Action Lawsuit Continues news | 5 days ago
- December 12: Toyota Tundra Engine Recall Lawsuit Filed as Class Action news | 11 days ago
- December 6: Toyota RAV4 and Lexus NX Wheels May Fall Off recalls | 17 days ago
- December 2: Toyota Door Lock Actuator Problems Cause Lawsuit news | 21 days ago
CarComplaints.com Notes: Although the 2003 model year is the "worst" model year for the 4Runner, it's not really bad at all -- mainly it's just that the other 4Runner model years are even better. Howver the 2003 model year has no major problems & no unexpected problems for a 17-year old vehicle. We award the 2003 4Runner our Seal of Awesome, since overall versus other comparable models of the same age, it's very reliable.
Initially the 4th generation (2003 - 2009) 4Runner didn't earn our top "Seal of Awesome" rating because it received poor crash test ratings for rear impacts. However it's proven to have one of the lowest driver death rates out of all vehicles (not just SUVs), so we've bumped it back up to our top award.
10.0
really awful- Typical Repair Cost:
- No data
- Average Mileage:
- 178,000 miles
- Total Complaints:
- 1 complaints
Most Common Solutions:
- scrap it (1 reports)
suspension problem
Helpful websites
- No one has added a helpful site for this 2003 4Runner problem yet. Be the first!
A D V E R T I S E M E N T S
I had that vehicle in the dealership 2 years ago and not a word was mentioned about the frame going bad. I'm so pissed, they recalled the trucks, but not the 4runners. I have a friend with a Tundra the same tear as my 4Runner and her frame was replaced. The dealership told me it was undriveable and told me to scrap it. Are they trying to get rid of the evidence?
- Kimberly D., Sugar Grove, US