- December 1: Nissan Loses Appeal in Shattered Sunroof Class Action Lawsuit news | 41 days ago
- November 30: Nissan Class Action Lawsuit Decertified news | 42 days ago
- November 7: Nissan Z Recall Issued For Pop-Up Hood Problems recalls | 65 days ago
- November 1: Nissan Frontier Recall Issued to Replace Headlights recalls | 71 days ago
Radiator Leaked Coolant Into Transmission
2007 Nissan Pathfinder (Page 8 of 12)
This problem may be covered under warranty. Ask your Nissan dealer.
CarComplaints.com Notes: The 2005-2007 Pathfinder appears to have a widespread defect where coolant leaks into the transmission, causing transmission failure around 90,000 miles. Repair costs are typically upwards of $3,500.
According to the New York Times & a class action lawsuit, the defect actually extends through 2010 model year. More info here.
9.2
really awful- Typical Repair Cost:
- $3,980
- Average Mileage:
- 114,550 miles
- Total Complaints:
- 232 complaints
Most Common Solutions:
- replace radiator and transmission (152 reports)
- not sure (42 reports)
- replaced radiator and transmission (17 reports)
- replaced radiator (13 reports)
- bypassed radiator, added an external tranny cooler (2 reports)
- bypass trans cooler/add external cooler/replace pcm (1 reports)
transmission problem
Helpful websites
- Nissan Settlement - Please visit this website to see if you qualify for reimbursement or for nissan to pay for so much of the damage.
- Radiator Assembly Customer Satisfaction Program - Nissan has decided in the interest of customer satisfaction, to further extend the warranty for the Radiator Assembly on all 2005-10 Frontier, Pathfinder, and Xterra vehicles equipped with automatic transmissions. On a small percentage of vehicles, an internal crack on the oil cooler tube may occur leading to internal leakage of engine coolant. While the majority of vehicles will not experience this issue, for customer satisfaction purposes, Nissan has decided to further extend the coverage of the New Vehicle Limited Warranty on the radiator assembly, subject to certain customer co-pays that vary with age/mileage. The New Vehicle Limited Warranty coverage on applied vehicles for the Radiator Assembly (original terms 3 years/36,000 miles) will be extended from the current extension of 8 years/80,000 miles to 10 years/100,000 miles (whichever occurs first), including damage, repairs, replacement, and towing resulting from this issue. With the additional extension, the following warranty coverage and corresponding customer co-pays will now apply: Up to 8 years/80,000 miles (whichever comes first): No customer co-pay After 8 years/80,000 miles (whichever comes first) up to 9 years/90,000 miles (whichever comes first): Customer co-pay is $2,500 After 9 years/90,000 miles (whichever comes first) up to 10 years/100,000 miles (whichever comes first): Customer co-pay is $3,000 As with the prior extension, this extension of warranty on the radiator assembly will cover damage caused to other affected components, including the vehicle transmission, as a result of an internal leakage condition in the radiator assembly. However, existing powertrain coverage applicable to the transmission (5 years/60,000 miles) otherwise remains unchanged.
- Nissan Radiator Assembly ATF Contamination 2005-2010 Frontier, Xterra, Pathfinder - Have you filed a complaint with the US Dept of Transportation, the number is 888-327-4236 and the website is safercar.gov, according to the representative I spoke to the issue of the ATF fluid contamination is still under investigation but more complaints and data are needed to issue a safety recall involving the radiator assembly and transmission contamination. If you have not done so please file a complaint. Nissan needs to take responsibility for the defect rather than passing the repair cost to the consumer and dodging the issue!!!
A D V E R T I S E M E N T S
We recently had our 2007 Nissan Pathfinder breakdown due to a known issue that allows coolant into the transmission resulting in transmission failure. There was no indication of this issue until its sudden failure which my left my wife in a parking lot calling for a tow truck. The check engine light was illuminated and I was able to pull the code from the OBD II with a scan tool which revealed Code "P0717 Input/Turbine Speed Sensor Circuit No Signal?" and so I checked the internet for possible causes. To my surprise I found a lot of information regarding this particular issue as many people have experienced the same issue. I am now aware there was a class action lawsuit that Nissan settled by extending the warranty as follows:
Up to 8 years/80,000 miles, whichever comes first, extended warranty coverage applies with no customer co-pay.
After 8 years/80,000 miles, whichever comes first, up to 9 years/90,000 miles, whichever comes first, extended warranty coverage applies with customer co-pay in the amount of $2,500.
After 9 years/90,000 miles, whichever comes first, up to 10 years/100,000 miles, whichever comes first, extended warranty coverage applies with customer co-pay in the amount of $3,000.
I called our local Nissan dealership and was provided a number to contact Nissan Consumer Relations as he well aware of this issue and the repair would run over $6000 dollars. I called Nissan Consumer Relation and spoke with a representative, then a supervisor, and eventually Eduardo with Nissan Consumer Relations Executive Offices all of which stated that Nissan will not assist with the repair as my Pathfinder has 105,624 miles. There is currently an open investigation with (ODI) Office of Defect Investigations and NHTSA with multiple complaints regarding the same issue. It reads: "ODI received a petition requesting investigation of transmission damage attributed to contamination by engine coolant. The source of the contamination is a cracked ATF line that runs through an engine coolant chamber in the radiator." Most of the issues that I found were reported after 100,000 miles conveniently out of Nissan's extended warranty. I am currently searching for a repair shop to perform the repair since Nissan neglects to issue a recall on this part and wants to nothing to due with the high repair bill for a defective part they put in their vehicles.
- Ford P., ROSEVILLE, CA, US