- November 7: Nissan Z Recall Issued For Pop-Up Hood Problems recalls | 13 days ago
- November 1: Nissan Frontier Recall Issued to Replace Headlights recalls | 19 days ago
- October 12: Nissan Rogue and Infiniti QX80 Backup Camera Recall Issued recalls | 39 days ago
- October 4: Nissan LEAF Battery Fire Recall Involves Quick Charge Port recalls | 47 days ago
- September 24: Nissan Rogue Gas Smell Allegedly Makes Occupants Sick news | 57 days ago
CarComplaints.com Notes: The 2005-2007 Pathfinder appears to have a widespread defect where coolant leaks into the transmission, causing transmission failure around 90,000 miles. Repair costs are typically upwards of $3,500.
According to the New York Times & a class action lawsuit, the defect actually extends through 2010 model year. More info here.
10.0
really awful- Typical Repair Cost:
- No data
- Average Mileage:
- 184,000 miles
- Total Complaints:
- 1 complaints
Most Common Solutions:
- replace head (1 reports)
engine problem
Helpful websites
- No one has added a helpful site for this 2007 Pathfinder problem yet. Be the first!
A D V E R T I S E M E N T S
Well I guess I have to say compared to mileage of other vehicles that I was lucky. I purchased my 2007 Nissan Pathfinder brand new. I had no major issues with the vehicle. Three months and 184,000 miles after I paid off the vehicle I had to replace the cam sensors and then the fuel pump. OK... Thought all was good, then I got gas one night and the next day the car started to loose power, shake, became un-drivable.
After a visit to the mechanic and $320 in repairs to replace the spark plugs and burnt coils, the truck started putting out this cloud of white smoke that smelled and there was black liquid coming from the exhaust pipe while still at the repair shop. Mechanic thinks catalytic converters, then says no. Then determines that he thinks the engine needs to be replaced because the car had leaked coolant into the engine. Later determined that there was cracked head, cylinders damaged, so the engine needed to be replaced. In all over $3500 in repairs. At least I stopped counting at that point. Like I said before I guess I should just be grateful, it happened at 184,000 miles and not 90,000 miles. I still feel cheated.
If all this stuff is related then why wasn't there a recall earlier when this mess would have been covered? Nissan... you are failing me.....
- Freda C., Humble, TX, US