- December 3: Land Rover Recalls Range Rovers Over Suspension Dangers recalls | 19 days ago
- October 8: Land Rover Defender Windshield Replacement Lawsuit news | 75 days ago
- October 2: Land Rover Coolant Leak Recall is Needed, Claims Lawsuit news | 81 days ago
Land Rover Engineering Analysis EA07012: FRONT DIFF. / PROPELLER SHAFT FAILURE
2003 Land Rover Range Rover
FRONT DIFF. / PROPELLER SHAFT FAILURE
Power Train:Axle Assembly
Power Train:Axle Assembly:Axle Shaft
Power Train:Driveline
Power Train:Driveline:Differential Unit
Power Train:Driveline:Driveshaft
- Summary
- Summary:in a letter dated December 2, 2008, Ford Motor Company (Ford) notified NHTSA that Land Rover is conducting a safety recall of model year (MY) 2003 through 2005 Range rover vehicles built at the solihull (uk) assembly plant from January 3, 2002 through February 22, 2005, to replace the front driveshaft joint (NHTSA recall no. 08V-635, Land Rover recall no. P041). The front differential coupling sleeve and the propeller shaft may be misaligned resulting in spline wear over time, which may eventually result in the splines shearing.the defect condition can result in a loss of propulsion and subsequent vehicle disablement in the roadway or on the shoulder of the roadway. Furthermore, the defect condition can also cause loss of the transmission lock function when the vehicle is shifted into the park position.the loss of the transmission lock function can cause a vehicle rollaway condition if the emergency brake is not applied and the vehicle is unattended by the driver. In July 2008, Land Rover initiated a service action (Q041) instructing dealers to install a redesigned front propeller shaft, front differential coupling and heat shield kit to address the misalignment and subsequent spline wear.this is the same repair procedure that will be used in safety recall 08V-635.approximately 48 percent of the subject vehicles (18,000) have had the remedy performed under service action Q041 as of December 2, 2008. ODI believes that sudden loss of motive power without warning and failure of the transmission lock function are safety consequences that, particularly in the context of the high failure rate of the subject components, represent an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety as stated in a recall request letter sent to Ford and Land Rover on November 6, 2008.Land Rover does not agree, but is changing its customer satisfaction program to a safety recall as ODI requested. Land Rover noted that it was aware of one alleged accident; however, it was unaware of any injury or vehicle damage associated with the alleged accident.Land Rover's recall resolves the safety defect concerns pursued by this investigation. This engineering analysis is closed.
- Documents (17)
- CLOSING RESUME APPROVED * 12/10/08 * p
- FORD 2/28/2008 LETTER TO OCC REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT
- RR TO MFR - ODI REQUESTS THAT FORD AND LAND ROVER CONDUCT A SAFETY RECALL. * 11/06/08 * p
- OCC 3/31/2008 LETTER TO TOYOTA GRANTED CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT TO TOYOTA 2/28/2008 LETTER TO OCC
- OCC 5/12/2008 LETTER TO FORD GRANTED CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT TO FORD 2/28/2008 LETTER TO OCC
- TOYOTA 2/28/2008 LETTER TO OCC REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT
- OPENING RESUME APPROVED * 08/14/07 * p
- IR TO MFR * 01/03/08 * p
- FORD RESPONSE FEBURARY 28,2008 LETTER TO ODI
- IR TO MFR * 01/03/08 * p
- IR TO MFR * 01/03/08 * p
- IR TO MFR * 01/03/08 * p
- GM RESPONSE TO 02/19/2008 LETTER TO ODI
- MEMO 2/28/2008 TO TIS, ONE CD, FORD 2/28/2008 ATTACHMENT
- MEMO 02/19/2008 TO TIS, ONE CD, GM RESPONSE WITH ATTACHMENTS
- TOYOTA 2/28/2008 LETTER TO ODI
- MEMO 2/28/2008 TO TIS, ONE CD, TOYOTA 2/28/2008 ATTACHMENT 1, 3, 4, ,6A & 6E
Click a tab for more information.