- November 18: Ford Expedition Seat Belt Pretensioner Recall Investigated investigations | 1 days ago
- November 18: Ford Battery Failures Investigated in Mavericks, Bronco Sports investigations | 1 days ago
- November 17: Ford Backup Camera Problems Cost Automaker $165 Million news | 2 days ago
- November 9: Ford 'Death Wobble' Lawsuit Certified as Class Action news | 10 days ago
- November 7: Ford Mustang Mach-E Lawsuit Over Battery Contactors Dismissed news | 12 days ago
Ford Preliminary Evaluation PE08070: STEEL WHEEL FRACTURE
2005 Ford Expedition
STEEL WHEEL FRACTURE
Wheels
Wheels:Rim
- Summary
- Ford special service vehicle (ssv) Expedition use a steel full face wheel design similar to that investigated in PE03009, RQ04007, EA04034 (Crown Victoria police interceptor) and PE03026 (GM pickups and SUVS).a total of 8,251 ssvs (2.2% of total production) were produced within model years 2004-2006 and sold primarily for use by state, federal, and municipal law enforcement (le) agencies.Ford stipulates that the subject vehicles are not suitable for high speed or pursuit operations and also identified a 2004 national institute for justice vehicle evaluation report which also acknowledges this limitation. The full face wheel is fabricated from two pieces: A stamped outer wheel disc and a formed rim.the two pieces, which together comprise the outer bead seat, are joined together with a circumferential weld.a cyclic bending moment occurs in the outer bead seat area as the wheel rotates, resulting in fatigue stresses in the weld's heat affected zone that can lead to fracturing (cracking) of the rim material.because the failure occurs under the outboard tire bead, air leakage may not readily occur when the rim cracks, dependent on how well the bead seals on the rim.if multiple cracks grow undetected and suddenly join into a single large crack, the wheel's structure can become compromised leading to rapid air loss.a rapid air loss, especially at higher speed, may lead to a crash. Ford responded to ODI's January 5, 2009 information request (ir) on February 24.Ford's response acknowledges a number of wheel fractures on the ssvs.however, based on its assessment of the pertinent factors, it concludes that the condition does not represent an unreasonable risk to safety.the lack of reports of rapid air loss, no alleged crashes, and their assessment that a cracked wheel can be detected through slow, repeated air loss or vibration, were the bases for Ford's conclusion.Ford discusses the results of a study it performed on wheels returned from le field use, design revisions it made to the subject wheel, and the outcome of durability testing it conducted on the old and new wheel designs. The counts shown above include a duplicate ODI and Ford report; the Ford counts are unique vehicles alleging wheel fracture(s).some warranty claims involved more than one wheel replacement.although the subject vehicles have been in service for a longer period of time than vehicles investigated in the previous investigations of two-piece wheel fracture, ODI did not identify any allegations of crashes, rapid air loss events due to wheel fractures or allegations of effects on vehicle control or stability, as were the cases in past investigations where safety recalls were conducted to replace affected wheels.the Agency agrees that the ssv is not suitable for pursuit or high speed usage, reducing the potential for crashes or loss of control incidents to be caused by the alleged defect. Ford implemented a 'shot peening' process in June 2006 which reduced the wheel's surface stress and significantly improved its durability, and ODI is unaware of any failures of shot peened wheels (service part number 7L1Z-1015-B).Ford's testing showed a slightly reduced durability for the non-shot peened wheels when 'lt' instead of Ford approved 'P' metric type tires are used. A safety-related defect has not been identified at this time and further use of Agency resources does not appear to be warranted.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by NHTSA that a safety-related defect does not exist.the Agency will take further action if warranted by further C
- Documents (12)
- FORD RESPONSE DATA 02/24/2009 APPENDIX B, D, H, G, K, INFORMATION FROM CD
- OPENING RESUME APPROVED * 12/09/08 * p
- FORD RESPONSE 2/24/2009 LETTER TO ODI
- IR TO MFR - * 01/05/09 * p - to investigate allegations of steel wheel rim fractures.
- CLOSING RESUME APPROVED * 04/15/09 * p
- FORD RESPONSE DATA 02/24/2009 APPENDIX E, NON-CONF BUS INFO-ENGINEERING REVIEW & NON CONF BUS INFO-WARRANTY, INFORMATION FROM CD
- FORD RESPONSE DATA 02/24/2009, APPENDIX I, CVPI_RATE & SSV_RATE, INFORMATION FROM CD
- OCC 5/20/3009 LETTER TO FORD GRANT CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT TO FORD 2/24/2009 LETTER TO OCC
- FORD 2/24/2009 LETTER TO OCC REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT
- FORD RESPONSE DA 2/24/2009 APPENDIX J, CD
- MFR IR RESPONSE DATA
- MFR IR RESPONSE DATA
Click a tab for more information.