- December 20: No Recall of 50 Million ARC Airbag Inflators, For Now news | 2 days ago
- December 19: GM Transmission Class Action Lawsuit Update: Appeals Court Ruling news | 3 days ago
- December 18: Chevrolet Equinox EV Recall Issued Over Pedestrian Alert Sounds recalls | 4 days ago
- December 3: GM Truck Tailgate Recall Involves 150,000 HD Trucks recalls | 19 days ago
- November 30: Chevrolet Equinox Caught Fire, Owner Sues Over Fuel Tank news | 22 days ago
8.5
pretty bad- Typical Repair Cost:
- No data
- Average Mileage:
- 87,700 miles
- Total Complaints:
- 4 complaints
Most Common Solutions:
- not sure (3 reports)
- replace engine (1 reports)
engine problem
Helpful websites
- No one has added a helpful site for this 2013 Malibu problem yet. Be the first!
A D V E R T I S E M E N T S
We purchased a 2013 Chevy Malibu as a certified pre-owned vehicle w/30,000 miles on it. With it we purchased 2 different CNA warranties. One is a wrap warranty & the other is a powertrain warranty. My CNA contract number is 22856489. The vehicle currently has just over 130,000. We brought the vehicle into the dealer because it was going through a lot of oil. The car has always had regular oil changes & never actually ran low on oil. The dealer notated a few small leaks that CNA requested to be sealed up before doing an oil consumption test. None of which were big enough to leave even 1 drop of oil on the garage floor where the car was always parked. The dealer did the repairs & had us bring the car back every 1,000 miles to check how much oil the car was consuming. The problem was still evident as the car was still burning 1.5 qts. of oil every 1000 miles.
CNA then instructed the dealer to tear down the motor & find out what the problem was. The dealer tech determined the cylinder walls were “out of round”. The tech noted how clean the inside of the motor was & that there were absolutely no signs of maintenance being an issue. CNA then sent out a 3rd party inspector who determined the same to be true. CNA then denied the claim stating that since there was no “part failure” they would not cover it. How would a cylinder wall be “out of round” without a “part failure”? CNA initially refused to even pay for taking the motor apart until recordings of them telling the dealer to do so were reviewed. CNA has since agreed that they would cover taking the motor apart but will not pay for additional seals, gaskets, & fluids to put it back together. Nor will they cover actually fixing the problem.
- Greg T., Cedar Hill, MO, US