- November 13: GM Recalls 514,000 Vehicles After Rear Wheels Lock-Up recalls | 7 days ago
- November 6: Another Chevy Bolt Battery Fire Recall recalls | 14 days ago
- October 28: Chevrolet Recalls Blazer and Equinox Over Door Strikers recalls | 23 days ago
- October 12: GM Vortec Oil Consumption Lawsuit Dismissed news | 39 days ago
- October 8: Enel X Way Closure and JuiceBox Charger Fires Investigated investigations | 43 days ago
Excessive Oil Consumption
2008 Chevrolet Avalanche
This problem may be covered under warranty. Ask your Chevrolet dealer.
8.0
pretty bad- Typical Repair Cost:
- $3,550
- Average Mileage:
- 91,450 miles
- Total Complaints:
- 16 complaints
Most Common Solutions:
- not sure (11 reports)
- replace engine due to damage caused (2 reports)
- install deflector in oil pan (1 reports)
- needed valve lifters plus push rods (1 reports)
- repair per Service Bulletin doc# 3665309 (1 reports)
engine problem
Helpful websites
- No one has added a helpful site for this 2008 Avalanche problem yet. Be the first!
A D V E R T I S E M E N T S
The low oil indication came on. Checked and added oil about every 2000 miles. One day, the plug fouled. Took it to the local dealer for service and he replaced the fouled plug #7 and the coil pack. This happen several times, about every 1500 miles. Finally went to a local engine shop and he told me oil was fouling the plugs. He advised it was a problem with this engine .
Soon after, the engine was running on 7 cylinders. When the shop looked into the problem the lifter on #7 was frozen push rod was bent. Pulled the head and found burnt valve. I had the valves on both heads push rods and lifters replaced.
Engine ran OK for about 20,000 more miles and # 7 plug began to foul. Added oil every 1500 give or take miles.. Finally I sold the vehicle. Estimated expense between the valve job plug replacements and old was close to $3000.
Considering the vehicles cost one would expect that when one adds a modification to an engine that enough testing would be done to ensure the customer of a safe and reliable product. Does not seem to be the case with GM or the cost to make a change to correct the impending issue was not worth the investment seeing how it would outlast most people's ownership of the vehicle.
- Ed M., Kingston, MA, US